Bowdoin or Vassar? Don’t get me wrong, they are both great schools. But Malcolm Gladwell seems to disagree. He flat out says, “Don’t go to Bowdoin, go to Vassar instead.” Bowdoin serves great food, but Vassar trades food to give more students financial support. Bowdoin has a huge capital base to fall back on if things turn bad, but Vassar can’t afford to lose even 10 students paying full university fees. Gladwell believes that social equality, the opportunity give more students the chance of advanced education is more important than luxuries. On a broader scope, I agree. Universities, as the ivory tower devoted to knowledge and social advancement, should always try to pursue the virtues of equality and social justice. But sacrificing quality for quantity is something I do not believe in. Vassar is something of a special case. It accepts far more students requiring financial aid versus students who don’t. Consequently, it can only give Spartan dormitories, sub-p
댓글
댓글 쓰기